Comments on: Some more random things http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/ Author of Urban Fantasy Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:56:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: cindy http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5803 cindy Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:21:00 +0000 http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5803 congratulations! and good luck on sorting out a new schedule--i also need to think about it. but i do consider blogging part of my writing as well. i'm so excited for you december!! congratulations! and good luck on sorting out a new schedule–i also need to think about it. but i do consider blogging part of my writing as well. i’m so excited for you december!!

]]> By: writtenwyrdd http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5802 writtenwyrdd Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:53:00 +0000 http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5802 I have to ditto Charles' comment. For some reason I've never been the least bit f/f curious in terms of reading, though.<br/><br/>Glad you are getting writing done. Sorry we won't see so much of you. Not that I've been commenting much in recent months! I have to ditto Charles’ comment. For some reason I’ve never been the least bit f/f curious in terms of reading, though.

Glad you are getting writing done. Sorry we won’t see so much of you. Not that I’ve been commenting much in recent months!

]]> By: December/Stacia http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5799 December/Stacia Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:20:00 +0000 http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5799 Oh, Marian, thanks! We haven't settled on the titles for the next two yet; currently Book 2 is "Downside Ghosts" and for Book 3 I'm leaning toward "City of Ghosts". Oh, Marian, thanks! We haven’t settled on the titles for the next two yet; currently Book 2 is “Downside Ghosts” and for Book 3 I’m leaning toward “City of Ghosts”.

]]> By: December/Stacia http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5798 December/Stacia Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:18:00 +0000 http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5798 Thanks everyone!<br/><br/>And I agree. I don't like the way any aversion, no matter how small, to the details of gay sex has somehow morphed into homophobia. I don't want to think of my parents having sex either, but that doesn't make me parentphobic, nor does it mean I think they don't have the right to have whatever sex they like. Thanks everyone!

And I agree. I don’t like the way any aversion, no matter how small, to the details of gay sex has somehow morphed into homophobia. I don’t want to think of my parents having sex either, but that doesn’t make me parentphobic, nor does it mean I think they don’t have the right to have whatever sex they like.

]]> By: kirsten saell http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5797 kirsten saell Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:51:00 +0000 http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5797 <i>If I know in advance there is an m/m scene in a book, I won’t read it. People want to tag straight people with ‘phobic’ in these instances;</i><br/><br/>LOL, Bernard, you are definitely a straight man! And there's nothing homophobic about a straight guy not wanting to read m/m (or misogynistic about a gay guy not wanting to read f/f, for that matter). But head on over and read my post titled "You don't have to be a lesbian". It explores some of the ways men and women differ in how they respond to erotic material. It explains exactly why you are understandably repulsed by m/m, while D (and most women, straight or queer) can get hot reading some sizzling girl-on-girl action. If I know in advance there is an m/m scene in a book, I won’t read it. People want to tag straight people with ‘phobic’ in these instances;

LOL, Bernard, you are definitely a straight man! And there’s nothing homophobic about a straight guy not wanting to read m/m (or misogynistic about a gay guy not wanting to read f/f, for that matter). But head on over and read my post titled “You don’t have to be a lesbian”. It explores some of the ways men and women differ in how they respond to erotic material. It explains exactly why you are understandably repulsed by m/m, while D (and most women, straight or queer) can get hot reading some sizzling girl-on-girl action.

]]> By: laughingwolf http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5796 laughingwolf Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:07:00 +0000 http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5796 grats again, dee... i'm clueless about a lot of things you posted here, but kirsten sez she won't set the hounds on me if i visit, quietly :O lol grats again, dee… i’m clueless about a lot of things you posted here, but kirsten sez she won’t set the hounds on me if i visit, quietly :O lol

]]> By: Marian http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5794 Marian Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:24:00 +0000 http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5794 Well done! If I might ask, what are the titles of the other two books? I like "Unholy Ghosts". Well done! If I might ask, what are the titles of the other two books? I like “Unholy Ghosts”.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5793 Anonymous Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:55:00 +0000 http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5793 HUGE congrats. So so happy for your deal lunch.<br/><br/>Anna HUGE congrats. So so happy for your deal lunch.

Anna

]]> By: BernardL http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5792 BernardL Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:23:00 +0000 http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5792 Thanks for sharing the success, D, congratulations! I can understand a straight woman’s aversion to reading f/f. If I know in advance there is an m/m scene in a book, I won’t read it. People want to tag straight people with ‘phobic’ in these instances; but it’s really not fear, it’s revulsion. There’s nothing political about choosing to read what doesn’t make you gag. There is a reason we have locking doors on our bedrooms. I see nothing wrong with ‘what goes on in the bedroom, stays in the bedroom’. If you write f/f, m/m, or f/m erotica with skill, and it’s profitable, I’m all for it. Tag it on the book cover so the reading public can choose. Thanks for sharing the success, D, congratulations! I can understand a straight woman’s aversion to reading f/f. If I know in advance there is an m/m scene in a book, I won’t read it. People want to tag straight people with ‘phobic’ in these instances; but it’s really not fear, it’s revulsion. There’s nothing political about choosing to read what doesn’t make you gag. There is a reason we have locking doors on our bedrooms. I see nothing wrong with ‘what goes on in the bedroom, stays in the bedroom’. If you write f/f, m/m, or f/m erotica with skill, and it’s profitable, I’m all for it. Tag it on the book cover so the reading public can choose.

]]> By: Michele Lee http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5791 Michele Lee Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:06:00 +0000 http://www.staciakane.net/2008/09/24/some-more-random-things/#comment-5791 Yay! Congrats!<br/><br/>It's always been a bit disappointing that f/f doesn't sell well because that's what I'd love to write. I think m/m is a bit glutted right now, and I'd like to see a real romance between two women, like you said, no politics, and no "for the entertainment of a man". Yay! Congrats!

It’s always been a bit disappointing that f/f doesn’t sell well because that’s what I’d love to write. I think m/m is a bit glutted right now, and I’d like to see a real romance between two women, like you said, no politics, and no “for the entertainment of a man”.

]]>