What Stace had to say on Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011
Write What You Know

You guys know I think a lot of writing advice is total crap. And really, that’s because it is. “Kill your darlings?” My ass. Yes, if you have to, you have to, and I know what the line is supposed to actually mean, but it sounds like you’re supposed to machete your way through your book chopping up anything you think is especially good. Um, why, exactly, would I want to do that? Were I to have “killed [my] darlings,” there would certainly be no Abominable Snowpimp. Although maybe that’s a bad example, because I was actually worried that it was too funny for the tone of the rest of the book. But my agent and editor and everyone else loved it so much I left it. The point still remains: You have to cut things that need to be cut, but really, if the good lines stand out with that much contrast in your work, maybe your work just isn’t good enough in general. (Sure, I have a few lines etc. I’m more proud of than any others. Every writer does. But I’d like to think they aren’t so much better than the rest of my lines that the reader stumbles over them.)

Personally I think most of those rules are crappity-crap-crap. And I’m sick of them all being passed around like Moses brought them down from the mountain. The fact is, if you write well and have a strong, stylish, commercial voice you can get away with just about anything.

But here’s one I agree with; in fact, one I believe in strongly. And I feel that it’s sadly, sadly misunderstood by many, which is why I’m going to discuss it.

See, I think there’s a belief out there, especially amongst beginning writers, that “write what you know” means that if you’re a farmer you should write about farming, or if you’re an office manager you’re not going to be able to write about the life of a wizard.

That’s not what it means.

“Write what you know” means write what you know emotionally. It means write what you understand and feel. It means write from the inside.

Great stories are important, yes. Great writing–or at least good writing–is important, yes. But what involves readers, what really makes them understand, identify with, and care about your stories–your characters–is making sure your characters are three-dimensional, fully developed people, with feelings. Your characters have to have emotional lives, because your readers have emotional lives. Your characters have to let their emotions color how they see the world, because your readers’ emotions color how they see the world. And your characters’ feelings and emotions, and their emotional desires and needs, have to be real and important to them, because your readers have emotional desires and needs that are very important to them.

I think I mentioned in an interview once that what really struck me about the responses to the Downside books was the way readers seem to either violently identify with and understand Chess, or violently dislike and not understand Chess at all. And I find the differences in those people, and the comments of the few I’ve seen who dislike her, are pretty interesting (to me, at least), in that their outlook on the world and the way they present themselves is one I often don’t understand or care for, either. That’s not to say it’s wrong or they’re a bunch of assholes; it’s also not to say that the only reason someone might not like my books or characters is because they’ve never felt that kind of alienation/loneliness/insecurity/dislike of self-satisfied people/aversion to being “normal” or whatever else. But it is something I’ve noticed.

When I started writing UNHOLY GHOSTS one of my main goals was to write a heroine I could identify with and understand, because I hadn’t seen any out there, really. I mean yeah, of course I wanted to write the most kick-ass different type of UF I could, but the reason why I cared about the book and the reason why the characters in it mean so much to me is because I worked really hard on giving them the feelings and emotions and outlooks that matter to me, that are what I understand. I know those feelings, and I know that outlook on the world, and I believe that’s why they were able to come across as clearly and strongly as they apparently did; it’s why those books are, frankly, deeply personal to me.

In other words, I wrote what I know.

I’ve been asked before what sorts of things I can’t/couldn’t write and I’ve always said I can’t really write happy people. I mean, of course I can write people who have found some happiness, or who have fun sometimes; no one wants to read a book where all the MC does is sit around moping and contemplating suicide. I’ve been unfortunate enough in the past to know a few truly negative people, the kinds of people who when I finally got away from them I was an absolute mess because just being around them was like being trapped inside a life-sucking black cloud of misery. That’s not good, and that’s something we all have to be careful with; certainly I find myself editing out some rather depressing little rambles on occasion.

Everyone has emotions and feelings. Everyone has their own unique way of looking at the world. You have to dig deep inside yourself and really feel those emotions, really think about how they affect the way you look at things. That’s what you put into your characters, and that’s what makes them real. If you’re giving your characters emotions or reactions you don’t understand or simply haven’t really thought about, the reader will know it. It will feel false, because it will be false. And false work means nothing to anyone; lies don’t resonate in the mind or the soul.

No, you might not know what it’s like to walk on the moon. But if you think about it, you probably do know how you felt when you achieved something amazing, or saw something that filled you with awe and wonder–even if it was something as simple as telling someone you love them or seeing Lord of the Rings for the first time. Those are the feelings you know. Those are the feelings you use.

“Write what you know” isn’t about the outside stuff, the plot or setting. “Write what you know” doesn’t mean your character has to do the same job as you, live the same life as you, and look like you. What it does mean is that your character has to feel–and have feelings–like an actual living person. It means those characters have to behave and react the way real living people would, and do.

Does it mean your character has to be just like you? No. But it does mean that if your character isn’t like you, you’re going to have to figure out how you differ and how you’re the same, and adjust your feelings accordingly, because they still have to be strong and real.

“Write what you know” means write from the heart. It means don’t be afraid to expose what needs to be exposed. Don’t be afraid to share something truly important, something truly meaningful, with your readers. Writing and reading should be about sharing; it should be about a universal experience the writer and reader share. It should be about feeling something, no matter what that something is. And if you aren’t feeling it, neither will your readers; if you’re lying they’ll know it, and it will at first confuse and then turn them off. They didn’t pay good money for something that rings false to them, that feels like manipulation, that feels like the writer didn’t think they were important enough to really work for. They didn’t pay good money to be fobbed off with something fake.

Writing fiction is telling a story, yes. But writing characters is telling a truth, and it’s your truth; the truth you know. You have to tell it as strongly, as deeply, and as well as you possibly can.

11 comments to “Write What You Know”

  1. BernardL
    Comment
    1
    · February 23rd, 2011 at 2:34 pm · Link

    ‘Personally I think most of those rules are crappity-crap-crap. And I’m sick of them all being passed around like Moses brought them down from the mountain.’ LMAO!

    I agree. Many of the best bad asses in literature were created by Casper Milquetoasts with imagination.



  2. Christine
    Comment
    2
    · February 23rd, 2011 at 3:21 pm · Link

    Amazing! I love this! Great post!
    xoxo



  3. catie james
    Comment
    3
    · February 23rd, 2011 at 5:08 pm · Link

    This – entries like this are exactly why you’re one of my favorite authors and bloggers.



  4. Erik
    Comment
    4
    · February 23rd, 2011 at 7:51 pm · Link

    Great advice…that is where all the good stuff comes from!



  5. Betsy Dornbusch
    Comment
    5
    · February 23rd, 2011 at 10:21 pm · Link

    Sometimes I think writing what you know is what separates the good from the great. Or even the wannabes from the good. It’s scary stuff to stick ourselves out there, but that’s what we signed on for in writing.



  6. AJ Larrieu
    Comment
    6
    · February 24th, 2011 at 12:38 am · Link

    So true. On some level, every story I write is an allegory for something I’m trying to understand about myself or about the world. Fantastic post.



  7. Joanna
    Comment
    7
    · February 24th, 2011 at 9:04 am · Link

    Well, I’ll try to remember it even if I’m not a writer. I think it’s as well about everything we do.
    Trying to do everything we do with our feelings and knowledge.
    :smile:



  8. Layla Messner
    Comment
    8
    · February 27th, 2011 at 1:05 am · Link

    I am so so glad you didn’t stop posting writing-related blog posts :). (As usual) I love this.
    I think that success with this aspect of writing generates a kind of resonance in the reader who identifies – i.e. Yes! This is how life feels to me, and I finally see it reflected.
    And sometimes, if we’re lucky, also an understanding in those who don’t see life that way – a crack to peer through into a different emotional world than their/our habitual one.
    Thanks!



  9. Uli
    Comment
    9
    · February 27th, 2011 at 5:20 am · Link

    Thanks Stacia!

    One thing i don’t understand is how do you remember all the amazing/hurting/intense/humble feelings that you have.

    I mean sure, you can keep a journal. Maybe it’s only my case, but my notes usually leave out the parts that i want to remember later, because they are either too complex or they seemed unimportant at that moment but turned out to be pretty important in the long run and so on. Plus the impressions fade and your perseption of them gets altered by the events that follow.

    So, how do you stay true to yourself?



  10. Dani
    Comment
    10
    · February 27th, 2011 at 8:59 am · Link

    Your post echos what I first felt about your writing–that it stems from emotional truth. I felt it, and that’s why I have such high praise for it. Thanks for sharing! Don’t ever change!



  11. Analisa
    Comment
    11
    · March 2nd, 2011 at 1:33 pm · Link

    Yes, that’s exactly what makes the difference between an author you love, and an author you like. One that moves you, and one that entertains you.



Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Tweets that mention Write What You Know | Stacia Kane -- Topsy.com
  2. Writer’s Workspace: 2/24 « Comedy or Tragedy?
  3. Two Quick Writing Links | Cora Buhlert

Leave a Reply










XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>